*PART SEVEN*

*The primary mind, to change the subject, is no more
attracted to the primary body than the primary body to the primary mind, since
that would amount to a contradiction in terms. What happens is that the
secondary body (bound) is attracted by the primary body (free) when the primary
mind (free) is insufficiently developed as to serve as an attractive
proposition for the secondary mind (bound). But if it is, then the secondary
mind (bound) will be drawn towards the primary mind (free) and you will have a
situation whereby, in effect, females will be subordinate to males as
pseudo-females in either pseudo-chemistry to physics or pseudo-metachemistry to metaphysics, as the class and/or axial
case may be. Otherwise you will get the converse of this situation in which,
through the attraction of secondary bodies (bound) to primary bodies (free),
males will become subordinate to females as pseudo-males in either
pseudo-physics to chemistry or pseudo-metaphysics to metachemistry,
depending on the class and/or axial case. But neither situation is necessarily
permanent, least of all the lower-order axial contexts of phenomenal
relativity, where the subordination of pseudo-males to females in one context
will be superseded by the subordination of pseudo-females to males in another,
as the genders exchange roles to greater or lesser extents, depending on the
individuals and their actual circumstances at the time, divided, as they
usually are, between professional and leisure engagements. However, in the
upper-order axial contexts of noumenal absolutism, a
primary mind (free) will not usually be attracted by a primary body (free),
since the one kind of freedom tends to exclude the other, like the Devil
excluding God or God excluding the Devil. This explains why certain great
minds, especially when philosophical or religious, tend to lead celibate if not
solitary lives, since too wrapped up in their own mental primacy to be much
disposed to the bodily primacy of those who would seduce them from it for
purposes at variance, even to an antithetical degree, with their own.*

*Sleep is doubtless the mind's most potent drug,
since it acts like a sedative and causes parts of the mind to behave in a
well-nigh hallucinatory manner through dreams and nightmares and even visionary
experience. Did we not spend so much time asleep it is doubtful that we would
be as indifferent if not hostile to narcotic drugs as we generally are; though
I fancy that some substance-based chemical alternative to sleep would more
appeal to insomniacs than to regular sleepers, who have probably had their fill
of visionary if not hallucinatory experience by the time they wake up and leave
the world of dreams behind them for the greater part of each day.*

*1.
**Metaphysics,
that noumenally subjective element of representative
soul, once-bovaryized ego, twice-bovaryized spirit,
and thrice-bovaryized will, regressing from superemotionality to subintentionality
via superintellectuality and subinstinctuality,
as from the superbeing and supertaking
of superconscious free psyche to the subgiving and subdoing of subsensuous bound soma.*

*2.
**Metachemistry**, that noumenally objective element of representative will, once-bovaryized spirit, twice-bovaryized ego, and thrice-bovaryized soul, regressing from superintentionality
to subemotionality via superinstinctuality
and subintellectuality, as from the superdoing and supergiving of supersensuous free soma to the subtaking
and sub-being of subsensuous bound psyche.*

*3.
**Chemistry,
that phenomenally objective element of representative spirit, once-bovaryized will, twice-bovaryized soul, and thrice-bovaryized ego, regressing from instinctuality
to unintellectuality via intentionality and unemotionality, as from the giving and doing of sensuous
free soma to the untaking and unbeing
of unconscious bound psyche.*

*4.
**Physics,
that phenomenally objective element of representative ego, once-bovaryized soul, twice-bovaryized will, and thrice-bovaryized spirit, regressing from intellectuality to uninstinctuality via emotionality and unintentionality,
as from the taking and being of conscious free psyche to the undoing and ungiving of unsensuous bound
soma.*

*1.
**Pseudo-metaphysics,
that pseudo-noumenally pseudo-subjective
pseudo-element of pseudo-representative pseudo-soul, once-bovaryized
pseudo-ego, twice-bovaryized pseudo-spirit, and thrice-bovaryized
pseudo-will, pseudo-regressing from pseudo-superemotionality
to pseudo-superintentionality via pseudo-superintellectuality and pseudo-superinstinctuality, as
from the pseudo-superbeing and pseudo-supertaking of pseudo-superconscious
pseudo-bound psyche to the pseudo-subgiving and
pseudo-subdoing of pseudo-subsensuous
pseudo-free soma.*

*2.
**Pseudo-metachemistry, that pseudo-noumenally
pseudo-objective pseudo-element of pseudo-representative pseudo-superwill, once-bovaryized
pseudo-superspirit, twice-bovaryized pseudo-subego and thrice-bovaryized
pseudo-subsoul, pseudo-regressing from pseudo-superintentionality
to pseudo-subemotionality via pseudo-superinstinctuality and pseudo-subintellectuality, as from
the pseudo-superdoing and pseudo-supergiving
of pseudo-supersensuous pseudo-bound soma to the
pseudo-subintellectuality and pseudo-subemotionality of pseudo-subconscious pseudo-free psyche.*

*3.
**Pseudo-chemistry,
that pseudo-phenomenally pseudo-objective pseudo-element of
pseudo-representative pseudo-spirit, once-bovaryized pseudo-will,
twice-bovaryized pseudo-soul, and thrice-bovaryized
pseudo-ego, regressing from pseudo-uninstinctuality
to pseudo-intellectuality via pseudo-unintentionality
and pseudo-emotionality, as from the pseudo-ungiving
and pseudo-undoing of pseudo-unsensuous pseudo-bound
soma to the pseudo-being and pseudo-taking of pseudo-conscious pseudo-free
psyche.*

*4.
**Pseudo-physics,
that pseudo-phenomenally pseudo-subjective pseudo-element of
pseudo-representative pseudo-ego, once-bovaryized
pseudo-soul, twice-bovaryized pseudo-will and thrice-bovaryized pseudo-spirit,
regressing from pseudo-unintellectuality to pseudo-instinctuality via
pseudo-unemotionality and pseudo-intentionality, as from the pseudo-untaking
and pseudo-unbeing of pseudo-unconscious pseudo-bound psyche to the
pseudo-doing and pseudo-giving of pseudo-sensuous pseudo-free soma.*

*Of course, it would be mistaken to suppose or
conclude from the above that elements and pseudo-elements exist in some kind of
splendid isolation from other elements and pseudo-elements, because they are
only the starting point for atoms and molecules and the constituents of matter,
including what goes into the making of human beings, in general. In all the
above examples, the bovaryized attributes of the
prevailing elements or pseudo-elements imply some other elemental or
pseudo-elemental bovaryization that, together,
combine to form the atom or pseudo-atom which has the properties described. *

*1.
**Therefore
one should conceive of a metaphysical atom as being comprised of a protonic soul, but a once-bovaryized
neutronic ego, a twice-bovaryized
electronic spirit, and a thrice-bovaryized photonic
will which would be replicated in molecules adding up to something
approximating a metaphysical bias for free psyche and bound soma in any given noumenally subjective male, whom one can only presume
partial to an atomic integrity comprised of most protons, more (compared to
most) neutrons, less (compared to least) electrons, and least photons, the
subatomic preconditions of joy and truth on the positive side and woe and
illusion on the negative side of what is customarily described as a 3:1 ratio
differential of free psyche to bound soma in respect, most especially, of the
absolute elements of protons and photons.*

*2.
**Contrariwise,
one should conceive of a metachemical atom as being
comprised of a photonic will, but a once-bovaryized
electronic spirit, a twice-bovaryized neutronic ego, and a thrice-bovaryized
protonic soul which would be replicated in molecules
adding up to something approximating a metachemical
bias for free soma and bound psyche in any given noumenally
objective female, whom one can only presume partial to an atomic integrity
comprised of most photons, more (compared to most) electrons, less (compared to
least) neutrons, and least protons, the subatomic preconditions of beauty and
love on the positive side and ugliness and hatred on the negative side of what
is customarily described as a 3:1 ratio differential of free soma to bound
psyche in respect, most especially, of the absolute elements of photons and
protons.*

*3.
**Similarly,
in dropping from noumenal to phenomenal planes, one
should conceive of a chemical atom as being comprised of an electronic spirit,
but a once-bovaryized photonic will, a twice-bovaryized protonic soul, and a
thrice-bovaryized neutronic
ego which would be replicated in molecules adding up to something approximating
a chemical bias for free soma and bound psyche in any given phenomenally
objective female, whom one can only presume partial to an atomic integrity comprised
of most electrons, more (compared to most) photons, less (compared to least)
protons, and least neutrons, the subatomic preconditions of pride and strength
on the positive side and humility and weakness on the negative side of what is
customarily described as a 2½:1½ ratio differential of free soma to bound
psyche in respect, more especially, of the relative elements of electrons and
neutrons.*

*4.
**Contrariwise,
one should conceive of a physical atom as being comprised of a neutronic ego, but a once-bovaryized
protonic soul, a twice-bovaryized
photonic will, and a thrice-bovaryized electronic
spirit which would be replicated in molecules adding up to something
approximating a physical bias for free psyche and bound soma in any given
phenomenally subjective male, whom one can only presume partial to an atomic
integrity comprised of most neutrons, more (compared to most) protons, less
(compared to least) photons, and least electrons, the subatomic preconditions
of knowledge and pleasure on the positive side and ignorance and pain on the
negative side of what is customarily described as a 2½:1½ ratio differential of
free psyche to bound soma in respect, more especially, of the relative elements
of neutrons and electrons.*

*1.
**Turning to
the pseudo-elements, which are subordinate to the elements, one should conceive
of a pseudo-metaphysical pseudo-atom as being comprised of a pseudo-protonic pseudo-soul, but a once-bovaryized
pseudo-neutronic pseudo-ego, a twice-bovaryized pseudo-electronic pseudo-spirit, and a thrice-bovaryized pseudo-photonic pseudo-will which would be
replicated in pseudo-molecules adding up to something approximating a
pseudo-metaphysical bias for pseudo-bound psyche and pseudo-free soma in any
given pseudo-noumenally pseudo-subjective pseudo-male,
whom one can only presume partial to a pseudo-atomic integrity comprised of
most pseudo-protons, more (compared to most) pseudo-neutrons, less (compared to
least) pseudo-electrons, and least pseudo-photons, the pseudo-subatomic
preconditions of pseudo-joy and pseudo-truth on the pseudo-positive side and
pseudo-woe and pseudo-illusion on the pseudo-negative side of what has to be
described as a 1:3 ratio differential of pseudo-free soma to pseudo-bound
psyche in respect, most especially, of the absolute pseudo-elements of
pseudo-photons and pseudo-protons existing under metachemical
hegemonic pressure.*

*2.
**Contrariwise,
one should conceive of a pseudo-metachemical
pseudo-atom as being comprised of a pseudo-photonic pseudo-will, but a once-bovaryized pseudo-electronic pseudo-spirit, a twice-bovaryized pseudo-neutronic
pseudo-ego, and a thrice-bovaryized pseudo-protonic pseudo-soul which would be replicated in
pseudo-molecules adding up to something approximating a pseudo-metachemical bias for pseudo-bound soma and pseudo-free
psyche in any given pseudo-noumenally
pseudo-objective pseudo-female, whom one can only presume partial to a
pseudo-atomic integrity comprised of most pseudo-photons, more (compared to
most) pseudo-electrons, less (compared to least) pseudo-neutrons, and least
pseudo-protons, the pseudo-subatomic preconditions of pseudo-beauty and
pseudo-love on the pseudo-positive side and pseudo-ugliness and pseudo-hatred
on the pseudo-negative side of what has to be described as a 1:3 ratio
differential of pseudo-free psyche to pseudo-bound soma in respect, most
especially, of the absolute pseudo-elements of pseudo-protons and
pseudo-photons existing under metaphysical hegemonic pressure.*

*3.
**Similarly,
in dropping from pseudo-noumenal to pseudo-phenomenal
planes, one should conceive of a pseudo-chemical pseudo-atom as being comprised
of a pseudo-electronic pseudo-spirit, but a once-bovaryized
pseudo-photonic pseudo-will, a twice-bovaryized
pseudo-protonic pseudo-soul, and a thrice-bovaryized pseudo-neutronic pseudo-ego
which would be replicated in pseudo-molecules adding up to something
approximating a pseudo-chemical bias for pseudo-bound soma and pseudo-free
psyche in any given pseudo-phenomenally pseudo-objective pseudo-female, whom
one can only presume partial to a pseudo-atomic integrity comprised of most
pseudo-electrons, more (compared to most) pseudo-photons, less (compared to
least) pseudo-protons, and least pseudo-neutrons, the pseudo-subatomic
preconditions of pseudo-pride and pseudo-strength on the pseudo-positive side
and pseudo-humility and pseudo-weakness on the pseudo-negative side of what has
to be described as a 1½:2½ ratio differential of pseudo-free psyche to
pseudo-bound soma in respect, more especially, of the relative pseudo-elements
of pseudo-neutrons and pseudo-electrons existing under physical hegemonic
pressure.*

*4.
**Contrariwise,
one should conceive of a pseudo-physical pseudo-atom as being comprised of a
pseudo-neutronic pseudo-ego, but a once-bovaryized pseudo-protonic
pseudo-soul, a twice-bovaryized pseudo-photonic
pseudo-will, and a thrice-bovaryized
pseudo-electronic pseudo-spirit which would be replicated in pseudo-molecules
adding up to something approximating a pseudo-physical bias for pseudo-bound
psyche and pseudo-free soma in any given pseudo-phenomenally pseudo-subjective
pseudo-male, whom one can only presume partial to a pseudo-atomic integrity
comprised of most pseudo-neutrons, more (compared to most) pseudo-protons, less
(compared to least) pseudo-photons, and least pseudo-electrons, the
pseudo-subatomic preconditions of pseudo-knowledge and pseudo-pleasure on the
pseudo-positive side and pseudo-ignorance and pseudo-pain on the
pseudo-negative side of what has to be described as a 1½:2½ ratio differential
of pseudo-free soma to pseudo-bound psyche in respect, more especially, of the
relative pseudo-elements of pseudo-electrons and pseudo-neutrons existing under
chemical hegemonic pressure.*